There are a lot of competing studies (and pundits) out there, but the general takeaway from conservative and liberal economists is that immigration is good for Americans’ living standards over the long run. That’s because immigrants raise the wages of native-born workers (and also lower the cost of immigrant-dense services like child care and cleaning).
immigration
Due to an act of Congress, Cuban nationals who arrive in the U.S. after 1959 cannot be illegal immigrants. They’re automatically refugees. It’s amnesty! The federal government has spent billions to assist those who’ve fled Castro’s regime. It was a Cold War policy, signed by President Johnson. If they can get to our shores (many have died in the process), they have an instant pathway to citizenship. They just have to get here. And since 1995, have what is referred to as “dry feet.”
I say this to Republicans who seem to be aspiring now to win the Latino vote: Cubans are not Mexicans. So when the party touts Florida Senator Marco Rubio as their go-to Latino – Politico called Rubio “the fresh-faced ambassador to conservatives” (It’s since been scrubbed) – they’re not wooing the 31 million Latinos who identify themselves as Mexican-American, the biggest Latino group and therefore biggest Latino voting bloc in the U.S.
Cubans may speak Spanish, and be from someplace else, but their immigration experience is unique to the island they come from … and our policy toward said island.
And Puerto Ricans, the second largest Latino group in the country, are also not “illegals.” They’re Americans. The island is a U.S. territory. I’m just trying to help you out, Republicans.
The point is: Putting Marco Rubio out on immigration reform is cynical conservative tokenism (àla Sarah Palin, Herman Cain and Nikki Haley), but it also proves the hypothesis by Mexican-Americans: Republicans don’t actually care about them. One clue is that they assume they’re pretty much Cubans.
Immigration reform’s focus (and sticking point) is what to do about the estimated 11 million people who live here without documentation. A 2005 Pew Hispanic Center report says 56 percent of them are from Mexico, 22 percent from other Latin American countries (mainly Central America), 16 percent are Asian, 6 percent Canadian and European and 3 percent African. (None are Cuban.)
Scott Walker’s recall election survival in Wisconsin last week was tough to swallow mainly because of his stance against workers rights. Hopefully it’s not a sign of things to come for workers rights, especially in the Deep South where organized labor has rarely ever been welcome, leaving the door wide open for exploitation, especially for immigrants seeking opportunity in the U.S.
We saw an unfortunate example of that near New Orleans last week, where eight seafood processors, working under H-2B guestworker permits, went on strike against alleged brutal, “slave”-like conditions imposed upon them by their employer C.J.’s Seafood. The workers were a fraction of some 40 workers working under similar oppressive conditions, said the protestors, most of them from Mexico. Michael Leblanc, the chief executive of C.J.’s Seafood, and also president of the Crawfish Processors Association, has been named in a legal complaint the workers have filed with the Department of Labor. At a protest in front of Sam’s Club, the bulk retail store that buys most of the seafood that guestworkers process, the workers testified that they had been abused long enough. (Read the full legal complaint here.)
Bridge the Gulf staff were there and reported that the workers complained of having to work 24-hour shifts with no overtime pay, having their wages stolen, suffering un-air conditioned living quarters with rats, enduring badgering if they attempted to leave their squalid housing area for leisure, and being threatened with violence or deportation if they complained or spoke up for their rights. And yes these immigrants have rights, and not only because they’re here on a federal work permit. Employers who’ve recruited massive immigrant labor dating back to Katrina have worked actively, though, to ensure that these workers have no rights that any company should respect.
Following a pattern of complaints from immigrant workers about being exploited and threatened with violence, arrest or deportation (or all three), the US Department of Labor instituted new guestworker program rules and regulations that protect immigrants from the kind of abuse testified about C. J.’s Seafood. You’d think that people who were devastated by hurricanes and failed levees, whose homes and businesses were built back in large part thanks to immigrant labor, would support rules that protect these workers. That’s not been the case, though.
Leblanc himself is suing the Department of Labor over the rule changes. Apparently a status quo of exploitation is good for the bottomline, especially at a company that brings in upwards of $20 million annually and has Walmart as its primary client. He’s just part of a small army of businesses, though, that are fighting DOL in court over the new worker protection regs, including the Louisiana Forestry Association and Bayou Lawn and Landscape. But it’s no surprise that business is trying to protect dollars at the expense of human lives. What is surprising is that government officials and the media are protecting business interests.
A student from Arizona in my world religions class in my evangelical seminary told me that he would never give a cup of water to an illegal immigrant because it is against the law in Arizona. Whether or not it is against the law in Arizona, it is not against Jesus’ law to give a cup of water to such a person. In fact, it would be against Jesus’ law not to give the cup of water to this neighbor, this fellow created in God’s image. Where did my student learn to think this way? From reading his Bible? From hearing sermons of this kind? He didn’t even struggle with his conviction, at least not outwardly. What would Jesus do? What would he have us do? Jesus tells this scholar (me) and that student’s pastors back home to go and do like the illegal Samaritan did and cross customs and boundaries and borders that keep people apart and care for the neighbor in need. If we do so, not only will they live, but also we will live. As Jesus tells the religious leader, so he tells us now: “Go and do likewise” (Lk. 10:37).
As the nation’s attention turns back to the fractured debate over immigration, it might be helpful to remember that in 1986, Ronald Reagan signed a sweeping immigration reform bill into law. It was sold as a crackdown: There would be tighter security at the Mexican border, and employers would face strict penalties for hiring undocumented workers.
But the bill also made any immigrant who’d entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty — a word not usually associated with the father of modern conservatism.

We immigrants are often shocked when we learn that a majority of Americans have never been to a college classroom. That needs to change, if this is country is to remain great. The choice is yours: You can work as hard as we immigrants have, and take maximum advantage of this country’s abundant educational opportunity, or you can take the easy way out and continue to moan about undocumented immigrants. (They aren’t going anywhere, so there is plenty of time for you to use them as scapegoats). You can start by demanding that your government invest more in your children’s education, and less in foreign wars — many of which have created the unbearable conditions that have forced us to flee to America to take your jobs. Until then, we’ll continue utilizing the wonderful educational institutions your hard-earned tax dollars have built and continue taking your jobs. Edwin Okongo: Blame Legal Immigrants Like Me for Taking Your American Jobs ☀
So if I’m understanding all of this correctly, today the president said that if you were brought to this country at a young age, by no choice of your own, which is to say that if the United States has been your home for as long as you can remember … . we will no longer put you handcuffs, put you on a bus or plane, then dump you in a country where you might have been born, but that is otherwise completely foreign to you. Somehow, this is controversial? In a humane, sane world, the country’s collective reaction to today’s announcement would have been, You mean until now, we were actually doing this to people? What the hell is wrong with us? The Agitator ☀

Tea Party zealots comprise the big roadblock to change. By making a ”no amnesty” stance on immigration a litmus test for genuine conservatism, the radical right has dominated the debate and made it difficult for politicians on either side of the ideological divide to address the immigration issue. The statement released this week by the Evangelical Immigration Table makes it much easier for presidential candidates to talk about immigration reform. Sure, the statement released on Tuesday is short on specifics. But when religious conservatives voice a common support for biblical compassion, human dignity and family unity, it’s time to celebrate. Evangelicals call for immigration reform ☀
If, as Christians claims, the story of the Bible is important to us, then we shouldn’t be so worried about foreigners; we shouldn’t be so afraid of immigrants. After all, the story of the Christian gospel centers on a man named Jesus — or, as we called him in my Hispanic family, Jesús: the one who was born on the migrant trail, moving from place to place, born to parents who did everything they could to protect him from Herod and his government, parents who even defied the will of Herod and snuck away under the cover of darkness, crossing into Egypt without proper documentation — sin papeles, as we would put it today. Called to Welcome the Stranger ☀
Most restrictionist and enforcement-first Republicans assume that most Hispanic voters are not likely to vote for the GOP for a number of reasons besides immigration policy. This may be a convenient assumption, but it also happens to be true. Whether or not stricter immigration policy “ought” to be alienating Hispanic voters, the assumption is that most Hispanic voters already disagree with the GOP on too many other areas of policy*. Liberalizing the party’s position on immigration would simply be unimaginative pandering that would also fail to win over many voters, and in the process it would cause significant disaffection among the party’s reliable voters. Bush, Perry, et al. lost the intra-party fight on immigration on policy and political grounds, and for once the party’s corporate backers did not get their way. Immigration restrictionists see an amnesty or semi-amnesty policy as the thing that will hasten the current GOP’s political demise. Restrictionists assume that the policy concession that is being promoted as the way to boost Republicans’ political fortunes will instead be the fast track to near-permanent minority status, and judging from the effects of the last amnesty bill they aren’t wrong. Eunomia ☀
Yet in spite of the church’s admonition to the faithful to love each other as children of God, no matter what an individual’s immigration status, GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has copped a hard-line stance on immigration — reviling a pathway to legalization for undocumented individuals as “amnesty” and proposing a plan to make life so difficult for illegal immigrants that they will “self-deport.” In doing so, he’s allied himself with nativist politicians, alienating many Latinos. Though the LDS church will not comment on Romney’s harsh immigration rhetoric, his immigration stance makes him a wayward saint, a bad Mormon, just as the church continues explosive growth in Latin America and among Spanish-speakers in general. Bad Mormon: Mitt Romney’s Anti-Immigrant Stance Doesn’t Jibe with LDS Teachings ☀
My family for six generations have been born and raised in Brownsville, Texas. Everyone speaks Spanish most of the time. Right now, almost every Republican in the state is trying to get redistricting to the finish line to cut out the bumper crop of Mexican-American candidates from coming up. They passed voter-ID laws recently, and you begin to get the idea after a few citizen deportations to Mexico that the Texan Republican legislature doesn’t really like us.
Ron Paul has gotten some trace traction with Puerto Ricans and Florida Hispanics recently. That doesn’t fix the fact that all his homies in Texas who have voted for him every year hate local Hispanics. His rhetoric sounds good sometimes because it seems so constitutional. Can you take a quick look at his immigration and border policies and tell me what kind of mess it would make (or not) for a Mexican-American to pick Ron Paul, much less anyone, in the GOP?
Valley Vato
I actually know more than a few Mexicans who are Ron Paul supporters (shout-out to P. Sergio!) because — as I’ve noted many times before — Mexicans are natural libertarians: want the government out of their lives, hate the drug war, and love money. But when it comes to the issue of immigration, Paul is two tacos short of a combo plate. For a man who believes in open commerce, he wants to severely regulate immigration. For someone who believes in people being able to determine their own lives free of governmental diktat, he doesn’t support the DREAM Act and wants to repeal birthright citizenship. For someone so right-on about America’s imperial wars, he’d have America’s military patrol the U.S-Mexico border. That Ron Paul’s immigration policy is basically no different than that of his Republican colleagues in the face of an otherwise-impressive policy platform is costing him millions of Mexi votes and is the biggest disappointment a liberty-loving Mexican has faced since the Mexican national soccer team.
A GNT creation ©2007–2013

