Homosexuality is abomination. The Christian Right says so all the time, and non-religious LGBT activists say it too, to relegate religion to humanity’s dustheap. After all, isn’t that what it says in the Bible?
No—and progressive religionists should not use the word. It’s a mistranslation and a misconception, doing harm to LGBT people and religious people alike.
The word “abomination” is found, of course, in the King James translation of Leviticus 18:22, a translation which reads, “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination.” Yet this is a thoroughly misleading rendition of the word toevah, which, while we may not know exactly what it means, definitely does not mean “abomination.” An “abomination” conjures up images of things which should not exist on the face of the earth: three-legged babies, oceans choked with oil, or Cheez-Whiz. And indeed, this is how many religious people regard gays and lesbians. It’s Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.Homosexuality is unnatural, a perversion, a disease, an abomination.
Yet a close reading of the term toevah suggests an entirely different meaning: something permitted to one group, and forbidden to another. Though there is (probably) no etymological relationship, toevah means taboo.
Sunday 4 July 2010
Does the Bible Really Call Homosexuality an “Abomination”? ☀
31 notes
-
mmmaybelline likes this
-
girlsmakebetterrainbows reblogged this from bowfolk
-
girlsmakebetterrainbows likes this
-
ellygreenwood likes this
-
dalasverdugo said:
Hah, so God doesn’t love three legged babies?
-
undercovernun likes this
-
cercamon2 reblogged this from azspot
-
wolf-hugs reblogged this from bowfolk
-
wolf-hugs likes this
-
existentialcrisisfactory reblogged this from azspot and added:
Unfortunately, it doesn’t matter what the bible actually says. Many Christians believe the KJV to be the only “real”...
-
wooliebear likes this
-
phoenixlily likes this
-
i-malwaysunpresentable likes this
-
insectiaa likes this
-
crowth reblogged this from azspot and added:
It’d be a good thing if ‘abomination’ fell out of usage. ‘Taboo’ is a softer word, sure. But when Leviticus 20:13 goes...
-
coreburst likes this
-
gangsofcats-withthumbs reblogged this from azspot
-
autoduncan likes this
-
lilymunster likes this
-
ancora-imparo likes this
-
azspot posted this
A GNT creation ©2007–2013
