AZspot AZspot

blue bits. red rocks.
Tuesday 24 June 2008

Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God’s will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all. Now this is going to be difficult for some who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, as many evangelicals do. But in a pluralistic democracy, we have no choice. Politics depends on our ability to persuade each other of common aims based on a common reality. It involves the compromise, the art of what’s possible. At some fundamental level, religion does not allow for compromise. It’s the art of the impossible. If God has spoken, then followers are expected to live up to God’s edicts, regardless of the consequences. To base one’s life on such uncompromising commitments may be sublime, but to base our policy making on such commitments would be a dangerous thing. Barack Obama

79 notes

  1. themcementality reblogged this from maniacalrage
  2. tatals reblogged this from girlytree
  3. gkojay reblogged this from squashed
  4. benjoseph reblogged this from davidtrawin and added:
    If we can choose...kind of intelligence and eloquence, maybe I can get back to loving
  5. fousheezy reblogged this from davidtrawin
  6. girlytree reblogged this from gelitripping
  7. theministryoftruth reblogged this from maniacalrage
  8. larslevie reblogged this from maniacalrage
  9. kielix reblogged this from faucet
  10. nostodnayr reblogged this from maniacalrage
  11. michaelikesit reblogged this from marco
  12. allisonandgeoffrey reblogged this from emilyposts
  13. dannyliberty reblogged this from faucet
  14. faucet reblogged this from azspot
  15. estarla reblogged this from peroty
  16. apatheticconformity reblogged this from maniacalrage
  17. pilnick reblogged this from marco
  18. emilyposts reblogged this from azspot
  19. danlo reblogged this from davidtrawin and added:
    was planning on pulling...Obama to win the election but I really wasn’t planning on going...
  20. chriswarren reblogged this from azspot
  21. ninakix reblogged this from marc
  22. ibroadfo reblogged this from marco
  23. frecklesmakemestrong reblogged this from azspot
  24. britne reblogged this from seriouslythough
  25. davidtrawin reblogged this from azspot
  26. gelitripping reblogged this from azspot
  27. sufficient reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    Okay, yes, I’m with you. At a certain point, though, the majority has the ability (and perhaps responsibility) to impose...
  28. pleaseshowmehowtolive reblogged this from julyshewillfly
  29. emiri-sensei reblogged this from marco
  30. shannern reblogged this from maniacalrage
  31. gbb reblogged this from maniacalrage
  32. themattsmith reblogged this from jonic
  33. aormond reblogged this from marco
  34. peroty reblogged this from maniacalrage
  35. drintelmann reblogged this from maniacalrage
  36. maniacalrage reblogged this from marco
  37. jonic reblogged this from marco
  38. jhalickman reblogged this from marco
  39. theduty reblogged this from marc
  40. ayse reblogged this from vruz
  41. parhasard reblogged this from marco
  42. adrcc2 reblogged this from marco
  43. twomoremiracles reblogged this from marco
  44. adamiss reblogged this from marco
  45. vruz reblogged this from griswold
  46. mattlehrer reblogged this from marco

A GNT creation ©2007–2011