AZspot AZspot

blue bits. red rocks.
Tuesday 24 June 2008

Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God’s will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all. Now this is going to be difficult for some who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, as many evangelicals do. But in a pluralistic democracy, we have no choice. Politics depends on our ability to persuade each other of common aims based on a common reality. It involves the compromise, the art of what’s possible. At some fundamental level, religion does not allow for compromise. It’s the art of the impossible. If God has spoken, then followers are expected to live up to God’s edicts, regardless of the consequences. To base one’s life on such uncompromising commitments may be sublime, but to base our policy making on such commitments would be a dangerous thing. Barack Obama

Notes

  1. tatals reblogged this from bowfolk
  2. gkojay reblogged this from squashed
  3. benjoseph reblogged this from davidtrawin and added:
    If we can choose...kind of intelligence and eloquence, maybe I can get back to loving
  4. fousheezy reblogged this from davidtrawin
  5. bowfolk reblogged this from newmotifs
  6. theministryoftruth reblogged this from maniacalrage
  7. larslevie reblogged this from maniacalrage
  8. kielix reblogged this from faucet
  9. nostodnayr reblogged this from maniacalrage
  10. michaelikesit reblogged this from marco
  11. allisonandgeoffrey reblogged this from emilyposts
  12. dannyliberty reblogged this from faucet
  13. faucet reblogged this from azspot
  14. estarla reblogged this from peroty
  15. apatheticconformity reblogged this from maniacalrage
  16. pilnick reblogged this from marco
  17. emilyposts reblogged this from azspot
  18. danlo reblogged this from davidtrawin and added:
    was planning on pulling...Obama to win the election but I really wasn’t planning on going...
  19. chriswarren reblogged this from azspot
  20. ninakix reblogged this from marc
  21. ibroadfo reblogged this from marco
  22. frecklesmakemestrong reblogged this from azspot
  23. britne reblogged this from seriouslythough
  24. mayagantt reblogged this from azspot
  25. davidtrawin reblogged this from azspot
  26. newmotifs reblogged this from azspot
  27. sufficient reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    Okay, yes, I’m with you. At a certain point, though, the majority has the ability (and perhaps responsibility) to impose...
  28. pleaseshowmehowtolive reblogged this from julyshewillfly
  29. emiri-sensei reblogged this from marco
  30. shannern reblogged this from maniacalrage
  31. gbb reblogged this from maniacalrage
  32. themattsmith reblogged this from jonic
  33. aormond reblogged this from marco
  34. peroty reblogged this from maniacalrage
  35. drintelmann reblogged this from maniacalrage
  36. maniacalrage reblogged this from marco
  37. jonic reblogged this from marco
  38. jhalickman reblogged this from marco
  39. theduty reblogged this from marc
  40. ayse reblogged this from vruz
  41. noahkai reblogged this from marco
  42. parhasard reblogged this from marco
  43. adrcc2 reblogged this from marco
  44. twomoremiracles reblogged this from marco
  45. adamiss reblogged this from marco
  46. vruz reblogged this from griswold
  47. mattlehrer reblogged this from marco
  48. griswold reblogged this from marco
  49. marc reblogged this from marco
  50. romeojulietsierra reblogged this from marco

A GNT creation ©2007–2010