I know the conservatives are hoping that undecided voters will tune in and see Mitt Romney suddenly reveal the Ronald Reagan-level of charm that he has heretofore been hiding. And I know they are expecting Obama to fumble and stutter over every issue without a teleprompter. (Because really, what kind of brain-washed, liberal, Lotus-eater would you have to be to assume that some chump – who’s only been a Harvard Law Review editor, a US Senator, a come-from-nowhere-to-beat-a-Clinton-in-a-Democratic-primary winner, and an incumbent President – would be able to debate his way out of a wet paper bag?) Unfortunately for them, neither of those things is going to happen. And even if they both do somehow magically occur, no undecided voters will see it happen. For the most part, undecided voters are people that don’t really follow politics all that closely, and as such they don’t really watch debates. On why tomorrow night’s debate won’t affect the election ☀
Thursday 4 October 2012
26 notes
-
awalt2069 reblogged this from azspot
-
jinxasaurus likes this
-
euripideanrondo likes this
-
chazkeats likes this
-
awalt2069 likes this
-
gnostix1 likes this
-
dystopiamachine likes this
-
saddlebunny likes this
-
imall4frogs likes this
-
eddietg likes this
-
joleebindo reblogged this from thehappiestbacksliderintheworld
-
dcfcutiechk likes this
-
joleebindo likes this
-
ifiwerescience reblogged this from thehappiestbacksliderintheworld
-
blissandzen likes this
-
pop-rocks-blowjob likes this
-
youdontneedtofollowme reblogged this from azspot
-
caaayleee likes this
-
mctumblovin likes this
-
notentirely likes this
-
azspot posted this
A GNT creation ©2007–2013

