It is clear that in a modern capitalist society, most of the non-propertied segment of society—overwhelmingly the majority of the population—is dependent on the private (propertied) sector for employment, thus income, thus well-being. There is, however, nothing in the arrangements of a modern economy to guarantee that the private sector will offer enough jobs to satisfy the needs of the non-propertied for work. (Nor, for that matter, that the wages offered will satisfy the needs associated with well-being.) Indeed, the normal case is that there is always some amount of unemployment; “full” employment (however determined) is exceptional and conventionally attendant to large-scale wars—when a goodly part of the labor force is sent out to kill and be killed. As the non-propertied (workers) are dependent on the propertied to provide them with employment, and if that employment is not forthcoming, then workers are “prejudiced” by the existence of private property: the “social contract” between the propertied and non-propertied has been violated; not all are advantaged by the arrangement. JA Conservative Defense of a Jobs Guarantee Program ☀
Sunday 26 August 2012
16 notes
-
ahandsomestark reblogged this from azspot
-
fyretrk reblogged this from theamericanbear
-
mctumblovin likes this
-
ziatroyano likes this
-
correajosefina likes this
-
scudmissile likes this
-
noonemeansme likes this
-
newsandtrade likes this
-
highvibrationsattract reblogged this from azspot
-
thefollowshipofthering likes this
-
gnostix1 likes this
-
4thcoming likes this
-
trsbn reblogged this from theamericanbear
-
marmaladeteardrops likes this
-
theamericanbear reblogged this from azspot
-
theamericanbear likes this
-
ilikemygrungelikeilikemysteak likes this
-
azspot posted this
A GNT creation ©2007–2013

