AZspot AZspot

blue bits. red rocks.
Wednesday 18 November 2009

It is true that excessive government deficit spending can be inflationary, and could therefore cause some impact on exchange value of dollar. But this can’t be viewed in some sort of vacuum. The size of the deficit is irrelevant in itself. There is no meaning in the terms ‘large deficit’ or ’small deficit.’ You have to relate them to the extent of labor and capital underutilization, which is a human measure of the aggregate demand deficiency. The fact that labor underutilization is now in excess of 16 per cent in the US (combined unemployment, underemployment and hidden unemployment) and capacity utilization is in the 60-65 per cent range rather than 90 per cent range sends one very clear message - the deficit is not large enough. So the correct policy response is to spend until we get to full employment. That is the only consequence of excessive deficits — insolvency is not possible. Your social security check will never bounce in a country issuing debt in its own freely floating non-convertible currency. Marshall Auerback

Notes

  1. adailyriot reblogged this from jasencomstock
  2. ryking reblogged this from azspot
  3. abcsoupdot reblogged this from azspot
  4. jasencomstock reblogged this from azspot
  5. azspot posted this

A GNT creation ©2007–2010