AZspot AZspot

blue bits. red rocks.
Thursday 5 November 2009

But the U.S. media’s willingness to mindlessly apply the term “terrorist” in exactly the subjective, self-serving way the U.S. Government dictates — starkly contrasted with their refusal to use the far more objective term ”torture” on the ground that the term is in dispute (i.e., disputed by the U.S. Government torturers) — illustrates the establishment media’s principal function:  to serve American political power and justify whatever our government does.  That’s a major reason — perhaps the primary one — why the U.S. Government has been able to get away with everything it’s done over the last decade.  Those unseen victims of torture, rendition, indefinite detention and other government crimes are all just “terrorists,” so who cares?  In reporting on these convictions, CNN immediately and helpfully proclaims Nasr to be a “suspected terrorist” in a way that guts any meaningful definition of that term and — in many minds — justifies whatever was done to him, no matter how illegal. It’s worth asking this question:  which sounds more like actual “terrorism”:  (a) kidnapping people literally off the street and shipping them thousands of miles away to be tortured with no legal process, or (b) what Nasr is “suspected” of having done? Glenn Greenwald

24 notes

  1. eyetwitch reblogged this from spaceships
  2. spaceships reblogged this from azspot and added:
    The U.S. media’s willingness to mindlessly apply the term “terrorist” in exactly the subjective, self-serving way the...
  3. jimihands reblogged this from vruz
  4. kjartanthemagnificent reblogged this from shorterexcerpts
  5. robot-heart-politics reblogged this from azspot
  6. abcsoupdot reblogged this from azspot
  7. shorterexcerpts reblogged this from poortaste
  8. poortaste reblogged this from vruz
  9. vruz reblogged this from azspot
  10. azspot posted this

A GNT creation ©2007–2012