Don’t pick winners; instead create the conditions for winners to emerge: Manufacturing may be our best hope now, but it is not the only path to a better future. We need a strategy that creates the conditions for new, innovative firms of all sorts rather than focusing too much on any one area.
Support areas of excellence: Although we shouldn’t pick winners, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t support areas of excellence once they emerge. Government should not lean against declining industries but there are times, as we learned with the recent bailout of the auto industry, when nursing important economic sectors through bad times can be beneficial.
Reduce inequality and increase opportunity so that winners can emerge from all strata of society: When some parts of society do not have equal opportunity, important potential is wasted. The more people that we have who are able and willing to discover new innovations or contribute in other ways, the better chance we have at discovering important sources of economic growth that benefit us all. Don’t let talent go to waste.
Provide the social insurance we will need to support the transition to a more secure future: If we want to make the transition to a new economy as smooth as possible, providing generous social insurance to those who will be asked to pay the price of change is essential. Workers are already fearful for their futures, and if things continue as they are or get even worse, severe social unrest is not out of the question.
As the economy recovers and we begin to take on the long-run deficit, social insurance programs will be an easy target. But cutting social insurance at a time of increasing turmoil and expecting the middle class – or what’s left of it – to take it silently is asking a bit much. We will grow wealthier over time, and we can afford to provide more insurance to displaced workers. If we fail to protect those who are vulnerable, the growing resistance to change will make it even harder to transform the economy.
Remove barriers to entry: The ability of new firms to enter industries is essential to achieving a robust, innovative, flexible economy. But entry hurts existing firms and they will attempt to block potential competition. For this reason, active enforcement of anti-trust laws – far more than we’ve seen in the recent years – is needed to ensure that the door is open for new ideas to be tried in the marketplace. In addition, though I don’t think overregulation is a problem generally, just the opposite, powerful firms often use regulations such as licensing laws to make it harder for new firms to enter. Barriers to entry, regulatory or otherwise, should be as low as possible.
Enhance technology, increase productive capacity, and invest in labor: Economic theory tells us that growth depends upon three things: growth in technology, growth in our productive capacity – including public infrastructure – and growth in the size and ability of the labor force. Education, while not the answer for everyone, is a big part of both discovering new technology and labor force ability and we need to do more to make education accessible to all.
Avoid setbacks: Recessions like we are experiencing set us back tremendously and we must do our best to prevent this from happening again. Increased oversight of the financial sector is an essential step toward this goal.
Wednesday 1 February 2012
7 Positive Ways to Secure Our Economic Future ☀
22 notes
-
imaginationssanctuary liked this
-
kjartanthemagnificent reblogged this from azspot
-
mindbabies liked this
-
uponadime reblogged this from azspot
-
anndfrankly liked this
-
gecko47 reblogged this from azspot
-
adefectiveidealist reblogged this from onehundreddollars
-
onehundreddollars liked this
-
onehundreddollars reblogged this from azspot
-
alsson reblogged this from azspot
-
alsson liked this
-
doublejack liked this
-
satoripart1 liked this
-
arigeezay liked this
-
deerlyawake liked this
-
sidoniob reblogged this from azspot
-
thelunacy liked this
-
scudmissile liked this
-
azspot posted this
A GNT creation ©2007–2012

