AZspot

30 notes

1. powergenie reblogged this from shorterexcerpts
2. id-by-dna reblogged this from brianvan
3. particlesoftruth liked this
4. sexartandpolitics liked this
5. whyinthehell reblogged this from azspot
6. willw2 reblogged this from fungazi
7. pieto liked this
8. buffleheadcabin reblogged this from azspot
9. iambal liked this
10. drunkbrunch reblogged this from brianvan and added:

    Last year, I served on a jury that convicted a rapist who’d committed the crime in the early 1990s. The reason he was...

11. dalasverdugo liked this
12. offnotesnotesnotes liked this
13. shorterexcerpts reblogged this from mandalay and added:

    So why don’t Republicans bring up cases like this as an example of invasive “legislating from the bench”?

14. marcusallenthecat reblogged this from mandalay and added:

    I don’t like the idea of this, but is CODIS/DNA databases really that different from the computerized fingerprint...

15. brianvan reblogged this from mandalay and added:

    Why don’t we just track everyone’s DNA anyway? What’s invasive about it? Is it so much different than requiring a...

16. seashelllz reblogged this from azspot
17. dhk reblogged this from mandalay and added:

    Hello Big Brother, I love you. mandalay:

18. mandalay reblogged this from azspot and added:

    Holy shit. This is unbelievable. The point is not that DNA testing is physically invasive; it is that it lasts FOREVER....

19. mandalay liked this
20. tumblklaat liked this
21. azspot posted this