AZspot AZspot

blue bits. red rocks.
Friday 29 May 2009

It is a fact that in America the term “socialism” is a smear. I’m not defending that fact. I wouldn’t give up defending programs merely because they could be so smeared. But I do think that now is not the time to engage in a playful redefinition of a term that has such a distinctive and clear sense. Whatever “socialism” could have become, had it not been hijacked by revolutions in the east, what it is in the minds of 95% of America is not what Wikipedia is. And indeed, when I look around at the real socialism of the past decade, I am almost Declan-esque in my revulsion towards it: America has plenty of “socialism.” The most recent versions we should all be very skeptical of. This is the general practice of socializing risk, and privatizing benefits. I’d be happy to join the “anti-socialist” movement if we could agree to end that perversion first. But that deal notwithstanding, I will never agree to call what millions have voluntarily created on the Net “socialism.” That term insults the creators, and confuses the rest. Lessig

18 notes

  1. cloois reblogged this from dalasverdugo and added:
    gaurav, last night with beers
  2. dalasverdugo reblogged this from azspot
  3. shorterexcerpts reblogged this from azspot
  4. azspot posted this

A GNT creation ©2007–2012