☼ AZspot ☼ AZspot

AZspot
Wednesday 13 August 2008

Claiborne/Haw have a section that I’ve heard Claiborne speak much of, “Amish For Homeland Security.” As much as he’s talked it up, I was surprised it was a mere couple pages of the book. But it conveys the point. He refers to the way, after the 2006 massacre in a schoolroom, the Amish community embraced the murderer’s family. Several of the Amish even went to his funeral in an impressive show of solidarity. They even asked that a portion of the money donated to the Amish for support be given to the killer’s family. The world watched such forgiveness with awe, seeing a deep picture of reconciliation. Claiborne/Haw play around with the question of “What would it have looked like if exhibited this Amish style, Matthew-5-esque forgiveness and creativity after 9/11?” What if instead of bombs, we have devoted the same money to building schools, supplying water, helping with food, etc. It’s very hard to hate someone who’s providing you with food and water and taking nothing in return for themselves. It is this creativity, love, and hope that is at the very heart of the gospel. Jesus for President

Social order is none the less necessary; the game must still have rules in order to be played; men must know what to expect of one another in the ordinary circumstances of life. Hence the unanimity with which the members of a society practise its moral code is quite as important as the contents of that code. Our heroic rejection of the customs and morals of our tribe, upon our adolescent discovery of their relativity, betrays the immaturity of our minds; given another decade and we begin to understand that there may be more wisdom in the moral code of the group—the formulated experience of generations of the race—than can be explained in a college course. Sooner or later the disturbing realization comes to us that even that which we cannot understand may be true. The institutions, conventions, customs and laws that make up the complex structure of a society are the work of a hundred centuries and a billion minds, and one mind must not expect to comprehend them in one lifetime, much less in twenty years. We are warranted in concluding that morals are relative, and indispensable. Will Durant

Americans have a tough time accepting the notion that even lowlifes have constitutional rights. You’d also have a tough time getting many of us to go along with the idea that a person arrested for a crime should be presumed innocent. Near as I can tell, these concepts remain difficult for us to grasp until someone we know is locked up. EJ Montini

Tuesday 12 August 2008

I have never accepted that the United States fits the mold of a “free market economy.” If we ever did, that model collapsed in the Great Depression. What was built in its place was a remarkable mix of public and private. There was, of course, plenty of room for enterprise. But it came in a framework, of a government that was, at its best, competently concerned with research, infrastructure, national security, the workplace and the environment, that provided Social Security and a large share of education, health care and housing. Part of the accidental genius of the system was that the public-private mix in those three areas, especially, created “soft budget constraints” that caused higher education, the medical sector and the mortgage market to grow very large - far larger than they ever could have, under either the free market taken alone or under socialism. While many notorious problems remained (especially our lack of universal health insurance), this enriched the middle class and was an immense source of growth. What Is The Predator State?

A GNT creation ©2007–2008